Jonathan Hoenig, The Capitalist Traitor
by Bucktowndusty
Jonathan Hoenig: n. The “Capitalist Pig,” and frequent guest on Fox New.
Private: adj. Secluded from the sight, presence, or intrusion of others.
Member: n. One that belongs to a group.
The capitalist Pig, Jonathan Hoenig, appeared on The O’Reilly Show last week and told guest Host, Michelle Malkin, that he favors unlimited, ILLEGAL immigration. He didn’t say he was for a guest worker program, or that he merely wanted to increase the level of LEGAL immigration. No, he bluntly advocated, with total disregard for American sovereignty and law, for an unending supply of ILLEGAL aliens. He simply saw nothing wrong with it.
I don’t know of any better way for a person to state how traitorous they are other than how Hoenig did. I don’t know of any better way for a person to prove how hypocritical they are other than how the first sentence of Hoenig’s Capitalist Pig Asset Management website does:
“Jonathan Hoenig is the Managing Member of a private investment partnership.”
How Jonathan can call himself a “member” of anything while supporting illegal immigration is beyond comprehension.
How Johathan can consider himself a member of anything when he doesn’t believe in citizenship - the ultimate membership that makes all other memberships inside America possible – is beyond imagination.
How Jonathan can think he belongs to something “private” when he supports illegal alien intrusions numbering in the millions each year is beyond ridiculous.
Patrick Buchanan once wrote, “Economic nationalism is the policy of rising powers, free trade the policy of declining powers.”
Teddy Roosevelt wrote, “Pernicious indulgence in the doctrine of free trade seems inevitably to produce fatty degeneration of the moral fibre.”
Well, Jonathan Hoenig is the personification of pernicious indulgence and the rotting of America’s moral fibre. And, nothing signifies “fatty degeneration” better than a pig.
Sadly, America is becoming a declining power, and people like Jonathan Hoenig are the reason why. Please email Fox News and request that they outsource Mr. Hoenig’s appearances to someone less traitorous.
Don't be a passive reader! Tell me what you think! Do you AGREE or DISAGREE with me? Let me know, and while you're at it, if you want me to write about something, let me know that, too!OR, Comment on our Blog |
Cut-n-Paste
by A. Hamilton
I know that I’m not going crazy, so someone please write and tell me that you saw and heard the same thing I did on the Chris Wallace show on Fox News, April 8, 2007.
On this particular show Chris Wallace questioned guest Newt Gingrich and Chuck Schumer on a variety of subjects including the firing of federal prosecutors, the funding for the Iraq war, and Newt’s previous statement where he suggested that Hispanics should learn the English language instead of speaking, “Ghetto language,”
I believe it was in the “Ghetto language” segment that Chuck Schumer cited reasons why Republicans lost both the House and Senate in 06.
Chuck quoted voting data from the 2004 election where the Republicans got 47% of the Hispanic vote, but in only got 27% in 06. He said, in effect, this was because Republican Congressmen such as J.C. Hayward wanted strict enforcement of immigration laws and that he came down too hard on illegal aliens in the run-up to the elections.
So allow me to extract. According to Chuck Schumer if any member of Congress tries to enforce strict immigration laws or comes down too hard on illegal aliens he/she will loose their jobs. Is this one of the wimpy reasons why our sovereignty is going to hell in a hand basket?
In an effort to answer my own question, I tried to review the video and transcript of that segment on Fox’s’ web site only to discovered that Chuck Schumer’s remarks concerning strict enforcement of immigration laws and the consequences of coming down too hard on illegal aliens had been stricken from the transcript and cut from the video.
To be fair, the transcript is listed as, “partial,” in that the omission of Chuck’s comments on this matter is what makes it, “Partial.” But isn’t it strange that the video of the segment also has the same omission? With this a bigger question arises.
Is there conspiratorial back-scratching between lawmakers and the media?
If you watched the Chris Wallace Show of April 8, 2007, check out the transcript and video at www.Foxnews.com and please tell me that I’m not imagining things.
Don't be a passive reader! Tell me what you think! Do you AGREE or DISAGREE with me? Let me know, and while you're at it, if you want me to write about something, let me know that, too!OR, Comment on our Blog
|